Talk:Pittsburgh Riverhounds SC/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: MPJ-DK (talk · contribs) 12:51, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Full disclosure: I am a WIki Cup participant, I have my own GAN (CMLL World Tag Team Championship) and I also have a Feature Article (CMLL World Heavyweight Championship) and Feature List (Mexican National Light Heavyweight Championship) candidates in need of input. Not that it's a factor in my review but it would be appreciated.

I am about to start my review of this article, normally I provide my input in bits and pieces over a day or two so expect running updates for a while.  MPJ  -US 12:51, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

GA Toolbox
So getting the obvious out of the way first, I am checking everything in the GA Toolbox


 * Peer Review
 * Lead is too short, WP:Lead states that an article of this size should have about 3-4 paragraphs
 * Captions - the info box image does not have a caption or an alt text
 * The Gallery of fans has no captions nor alt texts
 * The Gallery of stadiums has no captions nor alt texts


 * Copyright Violations
 * The tool list two possible violations at 47.6% and 46.8%
 * The timeline table seems to take verbatim info from web.archive.org/web/20060529120112/http://www.riverhounds.com/history.html and web.archive.org/web/20020815194040/http://www.riverhounds.com/archives/timeline.htm I would say that you should reword those a little


 * Disambig Links
 * ✅ no problems


 * External Links
 * The following references are dead
 * 13
 * 5
 * 45
 * 48
 * 46
 * 55
 * 99
 * 118


 * Probably dead
 * 33
 * 124
 * 143


 * Connection issues
 * 9
 * 50
 * 103
 * usopencup.com


 * The following references changes url, consider updating the links to prevent link rot
 * 28
 * 32
 * 31
 * 35
 * 57
 * 58
 * 68
 * 79
 * 114
 * 123
 * 134
 * 133
 * 136
 * 167
 * oursportscentral.com

This article is huge, there is really too much detail in the season sections since there are sub articles for those. I am putting this on hold until the 2013 through 2016 sections are cut down to a summary since they already have separate history articles. And I would suggest a similar approach to the last two sections of the history as well. I will leave it on hold for 7 days for the work on summarizing those sections to at least begin - not necessarily end in that point in time as long as work is going on.

- Status: Hold for summarizing and addressing the reference link issues. I can pick up the review again if these issues get addressed. MPJ  -US 13:14, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

This has been on hold for 7 days with no sign of improvements being made on the article. I am going to fail the article, but at least you have a list of issues to work on if you feel like submitting it for GA again.  MPJ  -US 14:10, 12 March 2016 (UTC)