Talk:Pixelmator Classic

tweaked the article a little bit
I tweaked the article a little bit, added some references and removed the templates. IMHO: i didn't think it was that 'commercially written' at all. I've seen much worse :) Husky (talk page) 19:35, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

Updated the article
I removed the Future Changes section because it was outdated. I also added version 2.0 to the version history table. ConnorGriffin (talk) 12:40, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

Criticism

 * Pixelmator has received criticism for not supporting graphics tablets pressure sensitivity[3]. It has also been criticized of being "sizzle over steak", in other words being over-hyped for an under-functional application [citation needed]

Well, I don't know if that's true but I do know that it supports it now, also, this program is blazingly fast! Wolfos1232 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 08:46, 18 October 2010 (UTC).

This is a completely useless section: One criticism with a single blog entry reference, and a vague statement without any references. I'm striking this. (And no, I'm not the developer. I'm not even a user.) --Steven Fisher 23:02, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
 * That's ok. I tried to find references for those two statements, but the only thing i found was the blog reference, which i agree isn't quite substantial enough. [[Image:Huskyoog.jpg]] Husky (talk page) 16:36, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

This article is to comercial! --212.93.140.102 (talk) 06:28, 5 September 2008 (UTC)