Talk:Plain Titmouse

Since the Oak Titmouse mentions the split in the opening paragraph is there any reason why this page can't simply redirect? It certainly doesn't need an entry to cover what appears to be an obsolete name. JohnCastle 18:57, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Tentatively Support. There are a few such cases where a vernacular name is simply dropped never to be used again after a split and while these are the most minimal of stubs, both species are valid redirects at face value (since we're dealing with a vernacular name here). The Oak Titmouse would at any rate be the correct species to redirect to as it uses the Plain Titmouse's specific name. Dysmorodrepanis 07:50, 20 November 2006 (UTC)