Talk:Plan B 2.0: Rescuing a Planet Under Stress and a Civilization in Trouble

Biased?
This article seems somewhat biased to me. "The book clearly summarizes in just 120 pages...new technologies and programs that are already working amazingly well and that obviously could be rapidly scaled up..." All accurate, perhaps, but it just seems so glowing to me. Then it goes on to try to argue for him that his solutions are relatively cheap. I not sure the mini-bio really belongs here either. -- General Wesc (talk) 01:26, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Yes, very biased. I think it was written by one person, who obviously supports the book... but the summaries are useful. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.15.33.143 (talk) 19:10, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The relevant guideline is WP:PEACOCK. --Teratornis (talk) 23:04, 28 February 2011 (UTC)