Talk:Plane (Magic: The Gathering)

To clarify...
So would it be fair to put everything into an order like this, from smallest, to biggest: planet, solar system, universe, plane (bunch of universes that are parallel?), and then multiverse? So then what comes after multiverse, if anything? And aren't parallel universes known to be infinite in modern day physics?

Also, if I'm right, doesn't that mean that planeswalkers don't really travel between different planes? I mean, they simply travel within one plane, between the parallel universes; but how are they to travel outside of their plane, and into a new one? Because as I take it, planeswalkers travel between different parallel universes to get mana and also, to cast bizzare spells only found in parallel universes. 24.23.51.27 22:47, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Plane and universe are synonymous. A multiverse is an group, most likely infinite, of closely connected planes. Beyond that is the omniverse, which is all planes. Noneofyourbusiness 00:11, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

There is space between planes. And measurable distance. see Equilor Deadbraincell 02:09, 19 January 2007 (UTC) 1-18-07

Segovia
I don't think Segovia is a plane so unless someone knows information about this Ill take it off soon. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Deadbraincell (talk • contribs) 21:38, 29 March 2007 (UTC).
 * I just did a Google search for "Segovia" "plane" "Leviathan". People on a couple of threads said that Segovia was mentioned in an old article of Duelist magazine as a miniature plane where everything is much smaller than its Dominarian counterpart, which is why only the Leviathan is worthy of notice. -- Noneofyourbusiness 21:55, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Segovia is a plane, confirmed here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.73.212.49 (talk) 08:22, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

Ravnica
Sorry to be a bother, but I found myself incensed at the destruction of a perfectly good and highly instructive page devoted to the plane of Ravnica, mysteriously merged into this current page and thus transformed, for no reason I can see, into a 1-paragraph stub. I for one feel this should be immediately reversed. -Leon —Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.149.22.209 (talk) 20:42, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

I wish I had been able to see this page before its deletion. Maybe can salvage something from the MTGSalvation Wiki? Missilepenguin (talk) 20:38, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

Phyrexia
I can see deleting the Phyrexia article and mentioning the content that was there here instead. But deleting all content besides "the new set, "New Phyrexia", is named after Phyrexia (when it's actually named after New Phyrexia, which is a renamedMirrodin) seems like overzealous removal.--Guillaume Hébert-Jodoin (talk) 17:10, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

I too was confused by this. Before becoming an active member of Wikipedia, I remember seeing lots of good info on Phyrexia here. I think Phyrexia is significant enough to warrant its own page, surely. If not, perhaps a direct link to the MTGSalvation Wiki which is pretty comprehensive? Missilepenguin (talk) 20:40, 1 September 2011 (UTC)