Talk:Planet Ladder

GA Review
Although in general the article is well put together, I have failed it's GA nomination for a number of reasons. The main problem with the article is that it is completely in-universe. See Notability (fiction) for some tips on how to write an article based on a work of fiction. Related to this first criticism is that the only sources of information cited are various volumes of the manga itself. Per WP:RS, these sources cannot be considered reliable. However, this criticism is somewhat a misnomer, since it is generally acceptable to cite a piece of media when describing in-universe facts (though if you were to add out-of-universe information, as I've suggested above, they would obviously not be sufficient). In doing so, I would generally try and cite specific in-universe facts (using in-line citations), and quoting whenever possible directly from the media itself. For a few examples of how to do this, see Final Fantasy VII and Dead Like Me. Hopefully these issues can be addressed at some point, and the article renominated for GA-status. If you have any questions or concerns about the article or about this review itself, please let me know and drop me a line on my talk page. Drewcifer (talk) 11:35, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

GA fail
This article is better than last time, it seems, but still not quite there. It is still overwhelmed with in-universe information. Reign that plot summary and character-description info in. I'd say cut it by at least two-thirds. And see if you can add anything more to the Reception and Production sections. Also, when citing websites, be sure to include the title of the web page. Wrad (talk) 01:06, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

=== Bad link to author website changed. Looking for better Official site. Rozzychan (talk) 02:17, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

GA fail once more
Sorry to disappoint, but the page is currently missing several standard components for a manga article, which make the page incomplete. Have you looked at the structure of similar Good Articles on manga? That could be quite helpful to you.

Specifically, WP:MOS-MANGA recommends a "Production" and "Media" section. Right now the content that should be in these two is mashed into the manga/promotion section. I suggest splitting them to be in line with other pages. Also, you need to add the publication information for the 7 volumes (English and Japanese). This data is easily obtainable through sources like Amazon, and can be organized using the Template:Graphic novel list. That last one will also throw your in universe/out of universe balance closer to the ideal, so it will be good all around.

Good luck, and good work so far. If you have any additional questions, feel free to stop by my talk page. --erachima talk 10:14, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

Reviews

 * http://www.animenewsnetwork.com/tankobon-tower/2004-02-11 Rapunzel-bellflower (talk) 17:24, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

Bad ISBN
ISBN 978-4-420-17044-1, the "Japanese ISBN" for No. 05 September 25, 2002, is causing a Checkwiki error #73 "ISBN-13 with wrong checksum". I cannot easily find Japanese ISBNs. Would somebody who has access to No. 05 please correct it? You can test an ISBN by clicking on its link; bad ISBNs produce an error message. Thanks. Knife-in-the-drawer (talk) 17:02, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Planet Ladder. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100623234246/http://www.mania.com/mangareviews/planet-ladder-vol01_article_81943.html to http://www.mania.com/mangareviews/planet-ladder-vol01_article_81943.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120301194326/http://www.naruri.com/works.html to http://www.naruri.com/works.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 05:30, 20 January 2018 (UTC)