Talk:Plasma Cutter

Merge with plasma cutting
No it should not be moved over. It is a term for "plasma cutting" which does have its own page.

See here for a reference:
 * http://science.howstuffworks.com/plasma-cutter.htm

A manufacturer of "plasma cutter"
 * http://www.millerwelds.com/products/plasma/

john 15:00, 17 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Can you distinguish between this article and plasma cutting right in the article?  At the very least there should be a see also link to plasma cutting Samw 00:47, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

When I went through Plasma Cutting, I found there already was the term plasma cutter in 2nd paragraph just not linked to its own page. I internally linked it back to here, not realizing your redirect trumps that action for now. which is a good thing. I will spend the next week to contemplate your suggestion to distinguish.

john 13:15, 18 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Wikipedia is case sensitive (except for the first letter) and distinguishes between Plasma cutter and Plasma Cutter.  IMHO if one redirects to plasma cutting both should.  If Plasma cutter and Plasma Cutter are the same, Wikipedia naming conventions dictate Plasma Cutter should redirect to Plasma cutter.   Let me know what you decide and I can help with setting up the redirects.  Samw 03:16, 19 May 2007 (UTC)