Talk:Play It Again, Brian/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Ed! (talk · contribs) 04:19, 17 December 2012 (UTC)


 * The lead should be expanded a little to include more background information about the episode. I like the way people are writing up the articles on The Office with a note about where its broadcast, some brief background on the show, the subplots, and a little more detail about critic responses.
 * "The episodes follows Peter and Lois, who are going through a tense time in their marriage..." this wasn't part of a two-part series or anything, so it should just be 'episode,' right?
 * Is there a promotional image we can use for the infobox?
 * There's a section in the infobox for guest actors, which I think should be included since there are so many, and their characters could be listed too.
 * Plot section: It would help if you put the voice actors in parenthesis after the characters they perform.
 * "Peter immediately begins enjoying himself, as being very annoying." -- I don't understand this, either.
 * "...and since then he has been criticized for the style of humor that he brings to the show." -- Are you talking about Herbert or Mike Henry?
 * It might also help to include a little on the deleted scenes you mention in the DVD release.
 * Cultural References: Isn't the Cleveland/Black Box scene parodying a music video? If so it should be mentioned.
 * Checklink tool is showing minor issues with several links, see if you can fix them.
 * Dablink tool returns no problems with disambiguation pages.
 * I am placing the article on hold pending the above improvements. — Ed! (talk) 04:33, 17 December 2012 (UTC)

I reviewed the article 10 days ago, and pinged the editor seven days ago. Having seen no response in terms of either edits or a response, I must fail the article for GA. It will need to be renominated once it meets the criteria. — Ed! (talk) 13:55, 26 December 2012 (UTC)