Talk:Playboy Club/Archives/2014

Fair use rationale for Image:Playboy logo.svg
Image:Playboy logo.svg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:43, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

These soon became the tail that wagged the dog.
What the hell does that mean?! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.74.54.196 (talk) 14:37, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Club addresses?
Anybody know the addresses for that big list of locations? Playboy's NYC publishing headquarters had nothing to do with the club, did it? They weren't in the same building, were they? --Ragemanchoo (talk) 08:50, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

Closings
The club in cologne was bankrupt 8 months after opening. People who can read german press can find references here:

http://www.bild.de/regional/koeln/playboy/verhoppelt-playboy-club-pleite-30449368.bild.html

http://www.bild.de/regional/koeln/insolvenz/pleite-akte-playboy-club-32073574.bild.html

Copyright problem removed
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 21:02, 9 October 2014 (UTC)