Talk:Pleasanton

Merger proposal of 11 January 2019
Oppose. No rationale by nominator, no input from any other editor before now, just two links which I keep falling across (for the fourth or fifth time?) in User:DPL bot error reports: Pleasanton and Pleasonton. (WP:MERGE and WP:RM proposals populate the main DPL bot error report, but it's no big deal if a consensus is reached one way or the other within a reasonable time; which nearly four months is not.)

Different places, different spellings, perfectly well handled by the two existing DAB pages with their WP:SEEALSO links. A merger would be more likely to cause confusion than to reduce it. The proposal is a solution looking for a problem, and busywork.

Pinging User:NapoliRoma as the nominator, in the hope of a speedy resolution to this issue. Narky Blert (talk) 21:17, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Yeah, it was a dumb request; I've removed it and tweaked the Pleasonton dab page.--NapoliRoma (talk) 16:31, 6 May 2019 (UTC)