Talk:Plum cake/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Wilhelmina Will (talk · contribs) 06:48, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

GA criteria
: With a few modifications made according to the points outlined in "Comments", below, the article is now grammatically and textually sound, as well as properly structured and organized. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 22:00, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
 * (a)
 * (b)

: The article is well-referenced, with a healthy bibliography of reliable sources. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 10:20, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
 * (a)
 * (b)
 * (c)

: Taking into account a note made by the nominator about the article's coverage, the article does appear to sufficiently cover all relevant aspects of its topic. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 10:17, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
 * (a)
 * (b)

. No traces of bias in the article's tone. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 10:13, 10 February 2016 (UTC) . It looks as though the article has never been subject to disruptive editing, since the time of its creation. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 04:28, 2 February 2016 (UTC) : All images used in the article are validly licensed, and make for relevant illustrative examples. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 04:27, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
 * (a)
 * (b)

Comments

 * In the "History" section, it mentions: In Old English, the term plūme was "from medieval Latin pruna, from Latin prunum, which equated to prune, followed by a citation. Where is the segment with quotation marks, beginning at "from medieval...", supposed to end?
 * I have corrected this in the article, adding the endquote and also italicization, per the source (diff, diff). North America1000 12:26, 10 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Also in that section, two passages read as, respectively, "the term plum cake still typically refers..." and "the term plum originally referred..." Odds are this boils down to nitpicking on my part, but I really think it's better to have "plum cake" and "plum", when referred to as terms, put in quotes - either singular or double - to emphasize that it's the word or phrase being discussed in that sentence, and not the object it refers to. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 10:32, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Quote marks have been added to denote terms in the article (diff, diff). Thanks for the suggestions. North America1000 12:26, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. I also took care of the complaints of an IP concerning clarification. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 21:58, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

I believe the article is now good to go. Congratulations! Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 22:01, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the review. Note that when working on this article, I used almost all of the reliable sources available online. The topic has received significant coverage, but many sources only provide mentions, etc. I mention this because while the article may seem short at parts, it's based upon most of the available reliable sources about the topic. North America1000 01:13, 11 February 2016 (UTC)