Talk:Po (lateral thinking)

Move to "Po (term)"
I believe the move is in order, as the current title "provocative operation" is just one of the operationalisations used by Edward de Bono. --Gurubrahma 10:04, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

Inaccessibility, notability, fringiness, and/or bias
I can't really understand this article because it seems to be written as a refresher or summary for people who already understand the concept. That needs to be changed to explain the concept better to people who have never heard of it… if the article is worth keeping:

Because the references are all from the same person, who is also the only person mentioned in the article as having studied/written about this concept, I'm not sure it's notable. It may be a fringe theory. The article may also be biased against the mainstream views even if its subject is not a fringe theory. I can't fix this stuff myself because I don't understand the concept. –PointyOintment (talk) 09:34, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

Hard to understand
I do agree with others that this article is very confusing. I am not familiar with the subject, so I cannot judge its fringiness/notability. However I did delete the paragraph about interjection which was for me, completely impossible to understand. I moved what could be salvaged from it in the lead. Shiningandenchanting (talk) 15:56, 13 May 2024 (UTC)