Talk:Poi

Trimming
I am going by Manual of Style (disambiguation pages), and by my feeling that the target article titles have exactly the keywords necessary to guide the reader. &mdash; Pekinensis 23:29, 29 July 2005 (UTC)

new additions?
The new additions to this dab page seem like they should be pointing to the "poi (juggling)" article. Any reason for this apparent redundancy? adamrice 16:40, 19 October 2006 (UTC)


 * I couldn't find any articles that had this content in them. I was actually planning to write them soon.  However, I will instead change at least one of the links to point at the Poi (juggling) page.  I am unsure what to do about the other.  Should it be removed? --  Tuvok  ^ Talk 23:42, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
 * That's a judgment call. IMO, poi-the-object and poi-the-activity do not need separate articles (to be honest, I've never heard anyone refer to the activity as "poi"). adamrice 13:54, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I got a CD straight from New Zealand that said, as part of its title, "20 Hakas and Pois". -- Tuvok  ^ Talk 19:50, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Currently the Poi (performance art) and Poi (juggling) link to the same page, this seems redundant. One of them should be removed. Thepillow (talk) 08:55, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

POI vs Poi
Don't see the point of separate disambiguation pages for these and suggest a merger of the two pages. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.178.4.10 (talk) 12:41, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

A tad sorry, anon, that no one else is compulsive enuf to take you seriously enuf to give you a reply. "POI" must refer to an acronym or other similar coding scheme rather than a word, while both poi and "Poi" are formal words, the units of natural languages. As I've never noticed anyone raising such a question (on WP or elsewhere), you probabably should ask a more precise question, or ask such questions in a forum where someone will rise to the bait by offering a more direct answer. Cheers! --Jerzy•t 19:05, 16 February 2019 (UTC)