Talk:Point Stephens Light/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 21:53, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: none found

Linkrot: none found Jezhotwells (talk) 21:54, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * Prose and compliance with MoS fine, I made a few minor copy-edits.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * References are to Rs, all check out.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Fine
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * OK, I think this adequately meets the WP:GACR, so I am happy to list this. I am sorry that you have had to wait do long. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:10, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * OK, I think this adequately meets the WP:GACR, so I am happy to list this. I am sorry that you have had to wait do long. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:10, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

Thanks you! --Muhandes (talk) 22:23, 23 January 2011 (UTC)