Talk:Poison (Nicole Scherzinger song)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: SMasters (talk) 13:55, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * 1) There were numerous punctuation errors throughout. For example, 'After dubbing it a weaker version of "Toxic" he said "And that...' requires two commas here. There are many more. I have fixed all of these but I do suggest that editors working on this to take a closer look at punctuation for future GANs.
 * 2) Online websites should not be in single quotes. They are not styled at all (i.e. no italics, etc.). See One Time (song) as an example. Also, there is inconsistency here. Sometimes they are in single quote marks and sometimes they are italicized, e.g. Digital Spy. Please make them all consistent and unformatted.
 * ✅ -- ĈÞЯİŒ  1ооо  02:22, 19 March 2011 (UTC)


 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * Article is properly referenced.
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * Article complies to WP:NPOV.
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * Article is stable.
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Just a few minor things that have to be fixed, but everything else is looking good. – SMasters (talk) 16:17, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for doing all the fixes. I'm confident that the article now meets all the requirements for a GA, and am happy to pass it. – SMasters (talk) 09:42, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Just a few minor things that have to be fixed, but everything else is looking good. – SMasters (talk) 16:17, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for doing all the fixes. I'm confident that the article now meets all the requirements for a GA, and am happy to pass it. – SMasters (talk) 09:42, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Just a few minor things that have to be fixed, but everything else is looking good. – SMasters (talk) 16:17, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for doing all the fixes. I'm confident that the article now meets all the requirements for a GA, and am happy to pass it. – SMasters (talk) 09:42, 19 March 2011 (UTC)