Talk:Poisonous amphibian

This has got to be one of the worst written articles I've ever seen. Seriously using the word "you" in an article?! I think half of this is copy and pasted from some other site. Clean this up. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.160.179.245 (talk) 20:02, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

excuse u
but i worked really hard on this and saying that i copyed this from another site is an insult so i gladly suggest that you mind ur own busness and critisize about some 1 elses page, oh and how can u criticize about some elses work when u didnt evan sign ur own sentence at the end while unlike u i did, how careless of u seruisly if ur gonna argue about some 1 elses document u should atleast also follow the other rules of wikipedia.--Jasonz2z (talk) 13:21, 20 July 2011 (UTC)


 * The topics discussed within this Wikiproject contain content that I'm not too sure are relevant to the topic that is meant to be discussed. Recreational ingestion of toxins can be an interesting topic, but the focus is primarily on poisonous amphibians. The lead section, in my opinion, is somewhat clunky and needs a bit of revision and clarification due to it being overly detailed. Prior to introducing the chart that displays the different species of frogs and toads, the introduction paragraph shouldn't prioritize a single species (in this case the Dart Frog). Overall, the article could use more information on diet and habits. To reiterate, the recreational ingestion of toxics could be a wiki page in its own right and ultimately the article should revolve solely around the topic at hand. Joseph73780 (talk) 02:18, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

Wiki Education assignment: Field Ecology and Conservation Technology
— Assignment last updated by Joseph73780 (talk) 14:39, 20 September 2023 (UTC)