Talk:Polar low

Article copied and pasted?
It looks like parts of the article have been directly copied and pasted from http://meted.ucar.edu/norlat/snow/polarlows/1.3_devofpolarlow.htm ; I don't think that is allowed...? AySz88 ^ -  ^  02:02, September 12, 2005 (UTC)

No violation
I have checked the website in question. The material is copyrighted to the University Corporation of Atmospheric Research. If you click on the "Legal Notice" at the bottom of the page (http://meted.ucar.edu/legal.htm) you will find the following statement in the "disclaimer" section:


 * "Access to and use of the content on this Website shall impose the following obligations on the user. The user is granted the right, without any fee or cost, to access, link to and use, publish, distribute, disseminate, transfer, or in any manner alter, modify, revise, crop, copy (an unlimited number of times), edit, digitize, and authorize such uses for third parties for any non-profit training, research, or educational purpose whatsoever and not for any direct or indirect commercial purpose or advantage."

--One Salient Oversight 00:58, 22 September 2005 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the clarification! AySz88 ^ -  ^  01:02, 22 September 2005 (UTC)


 * Wrong, this is a copyvio. This is a non-commercial licence which is not within the terms of Wikipedia. David Newton 00:15, 15 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The offending text was removed by NSLE. --AySz88 ^ -  ^  07:18, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

Deleted some nonsense
Hello. I'm new here...a meteorologist from Penn State. Should get an account soon...learning my way around Wikipedia. Anyway, this is my first edit ever. Someone had added a bunch of nonsense about "The Coming Global Superstorm" from "The Day After Tomorrow." Setting aside the validity of the claims made in the text, this certainly did not belong in this particular article. There are other articles where it could be better place. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.169.112.20 (talk) 04:10, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

New paper
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v467/n7313/full/nature09388.html may be worth adding after a couple of months William M. Connolley (talk) 11:57, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

Transitions
Can an extra-tropical cyclone become a polar low and vice versa?32ieww (talk) 02:02, 16 December 2016 (UTC) 32ieww (talk) 02:02, 16 December 2016 (UTC)


 * The problem is that not even the experts seem to know much about polar lows. What,for example are the "many small-scale cloud vortices at high latitudes" are the cyclones or anticyclones?:another problem is that there is no attempt to explain the mechanism. Presumably this is because only god knows what the mechanism is?

Critical mistakes from some editors
Some editors did not understand that polar lows are not extratropical cyclones in the polar regions, and polar lows are the completely different atmosphere phenomenons comparing to extratropical cyclones. Polar lows are more similar to subtropical cyclones, which are also shallowly warm-core, non-frontal, barotropic, small, and with a cold pool aloft. I am so sorry that I did not find those mistakes as early as I could. 🐱💬 07:06, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion
The file on Wikimedia Commons has been nominated for deletion. View and participate in the deletion discussion at the. Community Tech bot (talk) 22:09, 22 May 2018 (UTC)