Talk:Police Complaints Commissioner for Scotland

Untitled
It is of note that most of the complaint-handling reviews on the PCCS site read as being of largely pointless complaints against standard, correct police procedures.

In the very nature of the subject, it is to be expected that a fair proportion of complaints will prove groundless. However, I am aware of the detailed background to one PCCS review, and can vouch for the fact that this particular review excludes mention of several items of evidence which bring serious doubt on the correctness of police actions. This does beg the question, how accurate are the other reviews as to the course of events leading-up to the complaint?

Comments from other persons with knowledge in this area would be of interest. -If this grows beyond a few entries we'll move it to a separate blog, as Wikipedia isn't really for this kind of discussion. However, if this turns-out to be a verified cause for concern then the WP page could be updated to reflect the situation. --Anteaus (talk) 21:20, 6 June 2010 (UTC)