Talk:Policy and charging rules function

Wrong title
Is it "Policy charging _and_ rules" or "Policy _and_ charging rules"? 193.0.246.4 (talk) 09:29, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

According to the specs, you are completely right. Vdelau (talk) 16:33, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

The title is wrong, it should be Policy and charging rules function. The "and" is in the wrong place. In the text everything is all right. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.227.131.124 (talk) 10:31, 18 February 2013 (UTC)


 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the proposal was moved. --BDD (talk) 23:25, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Policy charging and rules function → Policy and charging rules function – The current title is obviously incorrect, please rename the article. See http://www.3gpp.org/ftp/Specs/archive/23_series/23.203/23203-c20.zip, page 18, section 3.2: "PCRF Policy and Charging Rules Function". Many thanks for the good work! 84.152.47.96 (talk) 19:07, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.