Talk:Polihali Dam

Copyright problem removed
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://issuu.com/outlookpublishing/docs/africa-outlook-issue-104 https://www.waterpowermagazine.com/news/newspolihali-dam-marks-significant-milestone-with-senqu-river-diversion-11063420 https://www.lhda.org.ls/Uploads/Documents/Newsroom/News/POLIHALI_TRANSFER_TUNNEL.pdf. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 03:28, 8 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Editors should generally summarize source material in their own words, adding inline citations as required by the sourcing policy.I did summarize the source material and paraphrase everything, though. (Let me fix that once more and try to summarize and paraphrase even harder). Rtnf (talk) 06:26, 8 May 2024 (UTC)