Talk:Polio

% of asymptomatic cases in the lead.
The lead paragraph states approxiamately 70% of cases are symptomatic however the source for that information says Approximately 70% of all polio infections in children are asymptomatic I could not find information on the number of cases in general that are asymptomatic. Could someone please revert this Watch Atlas791 (talk) 00:54, 16 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Fixed it. Bob (talk) 19:49, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Eradication
Is it just me? It seems extremely odd that there isn't a section in the article documenting the ongoing attempts to eradicate the virus (or did I just miss it?). With a fair wind, Polio will be relegated to the history section in the next few years. New funding for the ongoing attempt announced by UNICEF a month ago: https://www.gatesfoundation.org/ideas/media-center/press-releases/2023/10/one-billion-health-security-financing-eib-european-commission Rafflesgluft (talk) 08:57, 13 November 2023 (UTC)


 * OK, searching within the article I can now see it is covered, and does have its own separate article... however I think a top level section titled "Eradication attempts" or similar would make it much clearer to the reader? Rafflesgluft (talk) 09:00, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

WP:URFA/2020 review
I am reviewing this article as part of WP:URFA/2020, an initiative to review Wikipedia's oldest articles. Upon quickly skimming this article, I noticed some concerns which I have outlined below: Is anyone interested in fixing up this article? Z1720 (talk) 02:30, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
 * There are several uncited statements including entire paragraphs,
 * The "History" section doesn't seem to have post-2001 information,
 * The "Research" section is quite undevelopped and has an "update needed" banner from 2020.
 * There are some sources in the "Further reading" section that might be included in the article.


 * @Z1720I think I've finished. Please review. Bob (talk) 21:42, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

I am very busy in real life so I only took a skim, but here are some thoughts:


 * The research section still feels quite scarce. What is happening with polio research? Is it getting funding? What are they researching?
 * "Even if polio can be eliminated completely from the world population, vaccination programs should continue for at least ten years." Why? Says who? What does this have to do with research?
 * There are a couple of sentences that need citations, which I have indicated with a cn tag.
 * Can the history section be divided with level 3 headings? Or perhaps shortened? Usually, each section is 2-4 paragraphs.
 * I am not sure which bullet points in the "Eradication" section are cited to what. Can this be clarified, maybe with a citation after each bullet point?

I hope work continues on this. Z1720 (talk) 15:28, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

I'll add another review since pinged me here. In short, I'm sure this article has good bones from its original FA work, but articles naturally deteriorate over time, and this one needs some renovations to bring it back up to the FA criteria. The two big things (with a non-exhaustive list of examples):
 * Some reorganizing to improve readability:
 * Can we wrap the material in the Etymology section and the Passive immunization subsection into the History section? Polio has a rich history, if the section needs to be broken into subsections so be it.
 * Similarly, the Orthotics section is jarring. Merge into the Treatment section?
 * The regional blurbs under Epidemiology#Eradication should be merged into cohesive prose. They're very choppy now.
 * Speaking of which, a full description of the Eradication programs history, structure, and progress is probably due in as a separate article section (this is what I ended up doing at Dracunculiasis, another disease with a well-known eradication program).
 * Lots of odd sentences feel like they'd flow smoother in other sections: "The term "poliomyelitis"... of poliovirus", "Poliomyelitis does not affect any species other than humans", "A rare condition with a similar... enteroviruses other than poliovirus." (suspect this deserves slightly more detail elsewhere; any case of Acute flaccid myelitis is going to arouse suspicion of poliovirus), "Early symptoms of paralytic polio ... time the fever breaks", and more.
 * Time for some new sources, where appropriate - per WP:MEDDATE we aim to source medical material to references that were published within the last five years. Most polio cases are behind us, so if older sources allow a richer disease description, that's ok. But material that purports to represent the current scientific mainstream (like that in the Pathophysiology section, Diagnosis, Treatment, and the Prevention material that doesn't belong in the History section) would really benefit from updated source material.

These would require some moderately heavy lifting. Once addressed, there are some smaller prose issues that should be ironed out to make the article shine. But that can wait until we have structure and sources we like. Happy to help with this where possible, but realistically I won't have the bandwidth to take the lead on this or do more than a section or two for a while. In the meantime, if there's any way I can be useful, just let me know. Best, Ajpolino (talk) 02:46, 4 June 2024 (UTC)