Talk:Polish cathedral style

Merged
Yes, Polish Cathedral and Polish Cathedral Style should be merged. Further, the list of churches should have the patron saint given its own column (separate from the link -- if any -- to a page for that particular church).

Suspect either the Encyclopedia of Chicago (from the Chicago History Museum) or one of the Chicago history books would have documentation on this style. (Hey, before Royko wrote on what should be in a Chicago Hot Dog, where would you have found that documented?)

The preceeding unsigned comment was added by User:75.21.80.85 as of 16:45, 25 April 2007

St. Adalbert photos (Philadelphia)
Here are several St. Adalbert photos taken recently and are nominated for Wiki commons: Wikited (talk) 02:48, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

Offensive
Even though it seems to be commonly used, the expression "Polish Cathedral" is offensive.
 * Explain? Dicklyon (talk) 21:18, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

Requested move 15 February 2024

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) –  20:19, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

Polish Cathedral style → Polish cathedral style – Polish is certainly a proper noun, but I'm not sure why cathedral is capitalized. My Google search shows that cathedral is not consistently capitalized in the phrase, and usually when cathedral is capitalized style is also capitalized. SchreiberBike &#124; ⌨ 20:00, 15 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Support per nom. Not nearly consistently capped in sources, so we use lowercase per MOS:CAPS and WP:NCCAPS.  "Polish cathedral" is an architectural style or genre; per analogies in MOS:GENRE and MOS:MOVEMENT and such, no need for capping when a descriptive name is not a proper name per evidence from sources. Dicklyon (talk) 21:18, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.