Talk:Political communications

This article is inappropriate, to be short (as this also). There are some 5-6 external links. Maybe reading them would help to define wich are it's main fields, or at least, what is it's definition :) --VinceB 21:33, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Cleanup needed
I added an 'expert attention' tag. Cleanup is required, but I don't have the time of knowledge to provide it. Martpol 13:15, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
 * It seems likeit would be easy enough to clean up, but the explanations provided make little sense based on American ways of operating things. It was clearly written from a more european point of view. It needs to be made more generalized with a more worldwide worldview. --Lendorien 20:52, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Revising
I will be spending the months of June-December 2008 studying the field of political communications at both the University level and in a Non-Profit Organization. Perhaps, during and at the end of this time I will be able to contribute a high level of substance to this article. Hopefully, by then someone will have already added to it, if not, I will be here expanding and revising.

I will touch on the following:

Study of and fields of Political Communications New Media (a.k.a use of YouTube, blogs, podcasts, and websites in recent campaigns)

Political Communications in the United States

Political Communications in the United Kingdom

--Benchmark.stl (talk) 16:32, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Please do follow up on this! Your work on it would be much appreciated! --Lendorien (talk) 20:32, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

Article Evaluation
I think the section on the role of social media needs attention. The wording here suggests an opinion and could be adjusted ( ex: "need to establish themselves..." and "social media will be more important than traditional media..."). New15txstate (talk) 16:18, 18 September 2015 (UTC)