Talk:Politics of India

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 one external links on Politics of India. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120126154402/http://www.indianembassy.org/India_Review/2009/June%202009.pdf to https://www.indianembassy.org/India_Review/2009/June%202009.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20140303165635/http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/mumbai/shiv-sainiks-will-maintain-peace-post-ayodhya-verdict-uddhav/article1-603031.aspx to http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/mumbai/shiv-sainiks-will-maintain-peace-post-ayodhya-verdict-uddhav/article1-603031.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 03:42, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Citation for symbols used in Indian elections
The following can be used as a citation for the sentence "Symbols are used in Indian political system as an identity of political parties and that illiterate people can also vote by recognizing symbols of party": http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/ElectoralLaws/HandBooks/HANDBOOK%20OF%20SYMBOLS.pdf Venkam (talk) 02:05, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

majorly we seeing in the politics no people be supposed to live happy even we got independence and a democratic country, why because the funds released by the government is insufficient amount in that politic people  put the hands and it will become 30% were usually to use for the people. even daily life style adapt to change the people is everything fine and about studies, all the indians were educating  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.153.45.77 (talk) 10:18, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

Nepotism and NPOV
There's currently a section on "Nepotism in Indian politics". While this is pertinent information, presenting it in this fashion creates a POV issue by unnecessarily casting a negative light on Indian politics. I would suggest rewriting it to summarize Political families of India without implying that it's good or bad. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 02:07, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

I've changed the heading to a more neutral phrasing. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 00:40, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

State of Democracy
This section needs to state the problems facing Indian democracy a lot more clearly. IMHO, India ceased to be a democracy in 2014, and it was made official in 2019 with the passage of the Citizenship Amendment Act. 146.142.1.10 (talk) 18:24, 13 September 2023 (UTC)TTCUSM

Blatant Political Biasness Against a Particular Political Party
the part under WhatsApp elections and even the second paragraph, under political parties and alliances has been either written with the sole intent to put a political party in negative light, or has been picked up from a partial media source without appropriate research. Even if the allegations mentioned are not baseless, they are still allegations and have not been proved in any Indian Court of Law or even by any reputable international organization. Shameless accusations without indicating that it is merely an unproven allegation/possibility seems like a deliberate attempt to defame the world's largest electoral system, and by extension, the world's most populous country and democratic federal republic. Moreover, the Indian Prime Minister has been referred to as 'President Modi', and the informal nature of the writing proves the inexperience and puts its reliability under serious question. Reading this as a 17-year old Indian in 2024, five years after the 2019 elections, it is safe to say that propaganda is indeed being concocted, but not as much by the persons implicated in these baseless excerpts, rather much more by the very people who wrote them. Bhavyagoelstrld1107 (talk) 15:25, 6 February 2024 (UTC)