Talk:Politics of Massachusetts/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Hog Farm (talk · contribs) 20:46, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Gonna have to quick-fail this one. It's a long way from the good article criteria.


 * Lead
 * The lead is only a single sentence. It is too short and does not adequately summarize the article's content
 * "The politics of Massachusetts can been politically attributed as socially progressive since the early 1800s." - but this contradicts with "During the first half of the 1900s, Boston was socially conservative" later in the article


 * Antebellum
 * This section is almost entirely unsourced. We'll need inline citations for just about everything.


 * Gilded Age and Progressive Era
 * Likewise, there is just far too much uncited here.
 * This section seems to have an overemphasis on censorship, and doesn't discuss other factors in enough detail


 * Post-war
 * Only really talks about the nuclear stuff, when there are many other things to talk about as well


 * State
 * Unsourced, this needs inline citations


 * Federal
 * Unsourced


 * Party registration
 * Incomplete, we need some history as to trends and such


 * Completeness issues
 * I find it lacking that such issues as Abortion in Massachusetts, Same-sex marriage in Massachusetts, Gun laws in Massachusetts, and similar topics are not mentioned

Given that this article needs a lot more inline citations, and is far from complete, I'll have to quick-fail this nomination. Hog Farm Talk 21:07, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Alright, I will try to make improvements. Thank you for providing what is missing. Chutyo (talk) 21:27, 14 March 2021 (UTC)