Talk:PolyAnalytik

Contested deletion
This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... I didn't finish writing it yet --Dina96 (talk) 20:22, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
 * If it continues on its current trajectory, it still would likely be little more than an advertisement. I was monitoring this article from when it was created, since you indicated a major edit was underway, but all I saw was more promotional material get added. If it isn't finished a WP:DRAFT may be more appropriate, but this same content would likely meet WP:G11 there as well.
 * This is NOT a spam, this is an article about Research organizations like any other article you can find at this Category:Research organisations in England, please mention the "advertisement content" so I can delete it. -Dina96 (talk) 20:42, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Most of the article appears to be either singing the company's praises or a list of services they offer. Phrasing like "They offer analytical and bioanalytical services, including drug and impurity characterization, all supported by GLP standards. With a multidisciplinary team and advanced technology, PolyAnalytik Inc. helps improve patient outcomes through innovative solutions." and "This innovation empowers researchers and practitioners with valuable insights into biomaterial behaviour, ultimately improving medical device development and patient outcomes." Are pretty clearly promotional. TornadoLGS (talk) 20:47, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Solved, Thanks to mention that, all of these lines have been fixed and removed, anything else? . -Dina96 (talk)
 * Honestly, anything similar to that. Most of the text outside of the publications list reads like an advertisement. G11 applies to material that "would require afundamental rewrite in order to become encyclopedic." Phrasing like "a wide range of services" "advanced services" "Offering the most advanced X" usually comes across as promotional. TornadoLGS (talk) 21:07, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Solved, Yes I re-wrote it to become encyclopedic, I hope it's good now, so you can remove the speed deletion -Dina96 (talk)
 * It's improving. I'm a bit less experienced in this area so I might ask an admin for input. what do you think?. I will say that the page still leans rather heavily on WP:PRIMARY sources. I also posted as question on your talk page asking if you were affiliated with this organization. TornadoLGS (talk) 21:31, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
 * I replied to that. I think DOI.org -  WIPO.int -and  x-mol.net are all good resources for this kind of organizations, and you can remove the speed deletion template by yourself, no need to ask an admin for it; as you are not the creator of this article. -Dina96 (talk) 21:47, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
 * I mean for additional input in general. rather than on deletion. I did leave a message on their talk page. TornadoLGS (talk) 21:51, 11 June 2024 (UTC)