Talk:Polyhistor

Comment from 24.22.227.53
I've changed this from a redirect to a See Also stub, given the differentiation of the terms I explain in Polymath.--24.22.227.53 04:02, 28 July 2005 (UTC)

Make this less esoteric
It is not only unclear, it is esoteric. Please rewrite the entire second section. One shouldn't need a PhD to understand it. This is wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.138.135.42 (talk) 05:21, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

merge proposal
I've proposed to merge this into polymath. The two articles contain different comparisons of the two terms. At the very least, these two comparisons should be merged. Joriki (talk) 08:22, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

Why dilute the information for the masses?
I do not know how this was written before. At the moment it is very simple. So simply I don't know if it can stand alone. As it is written Polyhistor should only be a foot note under Polymath and not have a different definition. However, I do not agree that they are the same. I believe that a they should be kept separate. Would you say that a Doctor of Literature and a Medical Doctor should be considered the same. They are both doctors.

I would like to read more about the ancient meaning of Polyhistor. Give me the PHD version. —Preceding unsigned comment added by MayoVa (talk • contribs) 02:13, 5 August 2010 (UTC)