Talk:Polyozellus/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

GA review (see here for criteria)

This is an excellent little article, nicely written. Wonderful illustrations. Congratulations!
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): Clearly and concisely written b (MoS): Follows MoS
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): Well referenced  b (citations to reliable sources): Sources are reliable  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): Is broad in areas covered  b (focused): Stays on topic
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias: No OR
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.: Stable
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail: Pass
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail: Pass
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail: Pass

&mdash; Mattisse (Talk) 22:05, 15 July 2009 (UTC)