Talk:Polysomnogram

Actualy study...
Wikipedia's policies requiring verifiability and against original research precludes the inclusion of an "actual" sleep study - unless this study has been published and has been properly cited within the article. Rklawton 21:35, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Rklawton is correct, and the "actual" sleep study reports (added, I think, here) are still in the article -- going on two years now. 'Tis a shame, they are interesting.  They'll have to go.  Soon.
 * Unless someone with access to the several ISBN references can find them there? - Hordaland (talk) 07:47, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

Combine two articles?
Both the Polysomnography article and the Polysomnogram article are fascinating and informative. However, there is necessarily a lot of repetition. Ideally, someone who knows a lot about these things should combine the articles and redirect from Polysomnogram to Polysomnography. (I've put this same comment on the Polysomnography talk page.) Hordaland 15:55, 16 November 2007 (UTC)


 * I'd support such a merge. --Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 12:23, 18 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Yes, merge. SNALWIBMA ( talk - contribs ) 12:54, 18 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Hordaland, could you perform the merge? This doesn't sound controversial, but some duplicate information needs to be eliminated. JFW | T@lk  15:07, 30 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Have done some work on Polysomnography. Not started yet on Polysomnogram.  References are lacking.  The one has one ref from 1953.  The other a list of ISBNs.  And a bunch of external links; most or all from USA.  I intend to get back at this... - Hordaland (talk) 22:45, 4 December 2008 (UTC)


 * I just completed the merge. --Scott Alter 03:57, 16 May 2009 (UTC)