Talk:Pomeroy State Park/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: 23W (talk · contribs) 05:54, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Comments

 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

Looks good, very little comments (made some copy edits): Hold for 14. 23W 06:44, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * No pic this time?
 * "The Town of Lebanon": is it supposed to be capitalized like this?
 * "Oh Ranger" is techincally Oh, Ranger! and should be italicized.
 * "Joseph Leary noted": Joseph Leary who?
 * For Town of Lebanon - yes, because it is the governmental body and not the location. Oh Ranger has been fixed and updated to reflect it is a website. I do not have a picture for the park and I cannot use anything other than CC by SA because of image use policy. Flickr did not turn up anything on last check. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 20:03, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Changes look good, no sweat about the pictures. There is this source which describes it in the context of conservation, but it mostly rehashes what's mentioned in the article. Might be good to include later, but I won't hold the review for it. Passing. 23W 23:34, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Interesting source you dug up, it is far from the most neutral or detailed source in existence - it exists to garner funding support. The problem with it - this is a state park and is not a local body that controls it. The Town of Lebanon has the Open Space group, but Pomeroy is "open space" but not under their actual jurisdiction or control. The short blip on Pomeroy State Park adds nothing of real importance, but this might be good if I work on the towns. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 23:41, 26 January 2015 (UTC)