Talk:Pomoria

Redirection to Tribrachidium
The only known specimen of Pomoria is currently recognized as a poorly preserved Tribrachidium ( https://www.researchgate.net/publication/356726510_Trilobozoa_Precambrian_Tri-Radial_Organisms ). All previous ideas about this fossil were completely wrong. Aleksey (Alnagov (talk) 22:08, 21 February 2022 (UTC))


 * You Really Didn't Have To Ruin The fun.Rugoconites Tenuirugosus (talk) 20:04, 23 February 2022 (UTC)User:Rugoconites_Tenuirugosus
 * What are you doing? Read the paper I linked to. If Pomoria corolliformi is recognized as an erroneously erected genus, then why is it necessary separate wiki-artikle about it? Aleksey (Alnagov (talk) 21:28, 23 February 2022 (UTC))
 * Your actions must be reasoned why you think the redirect to the Tribrachidium page is incorrect. Let me remind you of the possible responsibility for the start of the edit war (Edit warring). Aleksey (Alnagov (talk) 21:56, 23 February 2022 (UTC))
 * Why did you undo the redirect? Alnagov gave a reason and a published source to justify redirecting Pomoria to Tribrachidium, and to be honest, your saying "You Really Didn't Have To Ruin The fun" doesn't make sense as a justification to undo it.  As much as I want it to not be true, either, what with my restoration of Pomoria being one of my favorite pictures, I find it difficult to argue with Alnagov now that I've seen a better picture of the holotype, which really does look like a deformed pair of Tribrachidium.--Mr Fink (talk) 01:54, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
 * See page 283 of "The Rise Of Animals: Evolution And Diversification of the Metazoa"
 * https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Rise_of_Animals/KsFFIrJ8IxEC?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=Pomoria+Corolliformis&pg=PA283&printsec=frontcover

"Or perhaps holdfast of member of Phylum Petalonamae" Rugoconites Tenuirugosus (talk) 19:51, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
 * No, because the paper Alnagov provided is more recent, having been published in December of 2021.--Mr Fink (talk) 23:39, 18 May 2022 (UTC)