Talk:Pompeiopolis

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Pompeiopolis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120923074837/http://www.klass-archaeologie.uni-muenchen.de/projekte/pompeiopolis/index.html to http://www.klass-archaeologie.uni-muenchen.de/projekte/pompeiopolis/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 11:33, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 19 October 2020
Several factual mistakes and misleading statements as well as unnecessary information of self-representation are edited. This is a new version:

Pompeiopolis (talk) 20:35, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Red question icon with gradient background.svg Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. I'm not going to dig into that paragraph and check each word to see if it's different. ◢  Ganbaruby!   (Say hi!) 01:42, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

Edit War
and, you have been edit warring. This is an editorial behavioural problem -- it doesn't matter which of you -- or both or neither -- has been factually 'right' or 'wrong'. Given that your edits have been controversial to one another, please: ~Hydronium~Hydroxide~(Talk)~ 00:00, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) Apply WP:BRD (bold edit, revert, discuss).
 * 2) Only add material using reliable sources given due weight with an WP:INLINECITE. WP:SELFCITE may apply here depending on which sources you use.
 * 3) Do not add unsourced/uncited material.
 * 4) Add inline citations to existing uncited sentences.
 * 5) Make incremental changes to see what is controversial and non-controversial.
 * 6) Only revert material that is disputed (easier because of incremental changes). If something can be tweaked rather than reverted, do so.
 * 7) Always leave an edit summary indicating what your change is, and why it was necessary/useful. For minor non-controversial edits this can be brief.
 * 8) Do not use insults/invective.
 * 9) If there's a dispute, bring it to talk on this page (with sources to back up your position if it's a dispute on facts rather than style).
 * 10) Larger structural changes could be started -- again incrementally -- with the addition of sections. See Pompeii or Chichen Itza or Petra for ideas. Edit slowly in the controversial sections and more rapidly in the non-controversial ones.