Talk:Pontifical Institute for Foreign Missions

Copyright cleanup
Content added by has been removed from this article for copyright reasons. In spite of warning, the individual using this IP has persisted in copying content from copyrighted sources without compatible licensing to Wikipedia. Please do not restore any removed text without first ensuring that the text does not duplicate, closely paraphrase or plagiarize from a previously published source, whether the one cited or another (issues have been detected from other sources than those named). Based on the editing pattern of this person, we cannot make the assumption that the content is usable. You are welcome to use sourced facts that may have been removed to create new content in your own words or to incorporate brief quotations of copyrighted material in accordance with the non-free content policy and guideline. See Copy-paste and Contributor copyright investigations/67.184.212.160. Thank you. --💵Money💵emoji💵💸 02:01, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

Categorization
The Pontifical Institute for Foreign Missions has been categorized as a Masonic organization given that it had been recognized by Pope Pius XI in some very particular circumstances.

The Lombard PIME of Milan was formed by the seminarists of the dioces of Milan. According to the Italian version of Wikipedia, Pope Ratti learnt ancient Hebrew in the Synagogue of Milan under the Master and Chief Rabbi Alessandro da Fano and was used to bring his seminarists in the Synagogue of Milan to learn the spoken Jewish (sourced by Yves Chiron, Pio XI. Il Papa dei patti Lateranensi e dell'opposizione ai totalitarismi, Cinisello Balsamo, Edizioni San Paolo, 2006, p. 77-78).

If this is true -and that would be very unusual-, then the Pontifical Institute for Foreign Missions would have had direct contacts with the Satanist Freemasonry, since the time of its foundation. And this information is coeherent to the fact that Pius XI become bishop in 1919, only after the death of Pope St Pius X in 1914 and 40 years after his own priestly ordination.

In 1873 the encyclical Etsi multa luctuosa defined the Freemasonry as the "Synagogue of Satan", while Milan was one of the Italian most important synagogues. In a certain way, Pope Pius X was prophetizing the installation of Satan within the throne of St. Peter the Apostle, as it is told in the ''The Exorcism against Satan & the Apostate Angels in Latin & English'': "("Where the See of the Blessed Peter and the Chair of Truth have been set up for the light of the Gentiles, there they have placed the throne of the abomination of their wickedness, so that, the Pastor having been struck, they may also be able to scatter the flock"

- (unofficial translation]

And St Pius X was probably the last Pope to be publicly exposed for worship after his death (fondazionegiuseppesarto.it, p. 17]), because people whi died not in sactity are not preserved by God from the decomposition of their rests. On the other hand, in 1925 Pope Pius XI promoted the "missionary action" (source: Pio XI, 80 anni dalla morte, February 8, 2009) of the Azione Cattolica, an organization in which has worked a Freemason like the future Pope Paul VI. And that is a soign of the Masonic presence in the Azione cattolica since the time of its foundation.

In my modest opinion, I don't think we can categorize PIMe and Azione Cattolica within a Cateogry:Masonic organizations. For example, PIME had an independent foundation in Rome, in respect of which we aren't acknowledged on an eventual Masonic presence. If need be, a twofold and unusual foundation in Rome and Milan confirms the precence of a twofold presence, both Masonic and truely Roman Catholic witihin the PIME. Any eventual comment would be kindly appreciated.Thanks for your attention.Theologian81sp (talk) 08:56, 27 June 2021 (UTC)


 * I suggest you read the policy on original research. If you can find a reliable source that directly describes PIME as a Masonic-affiliated organization and it's notable, then you can add it as such to the article and categories.
 * I also suggest you read the policy on NPOV. It is not the purpose of Wikipedia to describe subjects from a Catholic perspective. Soapwort (talk) 09:42, 27 June 2021 (UTC)