Talk:Pontins/Archives/2012

Apostrophe
Pontin's should consistently have an apostrophe shouldn't it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.158.45.40 (talk) 04:37, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

Nope, they've now dropped the apostrophe, check the most recent logo on the website. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.46.233.213 (talk) 07:17, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

So... shouldn't Pontin's redirect to Pontins now? Dubbin u &#124; t 23:57, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Requested move

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the proposal was Move. Dubbin u &#124; t &#124; c 14:08, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Pontin& → Pontins – The apostrophe is no longer used by the company - see http://www.pontins.com. Pontin's can be a redirect page. Dubbin u &#124; t 04:53, 10 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Move done. Now, can somebody with the appropriate tools please create a new version of the logo! &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 12:18, 21 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Thanks. New logo uploaded. I've taken the liberty of closing the move discussion since it was uncontested and you kindly carried out the move. Dubbin u &#124; t &#124; c 14:08, 21 January 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.