Talk:Poo

Discussion
Amazing that an article this bad still exists in a mostly high-quality Wikipedia.
 * Thanks for clearing up the vandauary 2006 (UTC)68.144.49.48 (talk) 19:47, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

This page really should be moved to Poo (which currently redirects here). The latter is the most common usage among those covered on this page.--Srleffler 23:28, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Done. &mdash; Nightst a  llion  (?) 09:05, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

Rampant vandalism
Just about every edit on this page is vandalism or someone reverting vandalism. Shouldn't this page be (semi?)protected? Richard W.M. Jones 12:22, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
 * It's nothing we can't keep up with. Semi-protection is a temporary measure used to stop rampant vandalism.  Here, we've had eight incidents since September 1.  That's nothing compared to what some pages get.  Powers T 22:45, 12 September 2006 (UTC)    HI

Another Idiot!
Someone vandalised the article AGAIN! Someone just went tglkhjidtjortjyhifyouhftihjyijhogtijhgyoi or somthing to that effect to nearly all of it. weeqgyepoopopopopopopopsgdffsdfgfgysdsdbsvbfui. I'm not registered and i couldn't be bothered trying to fix it but someone has to. If you are reading this do what you can. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 83.70.78.118 (talk • contribs).
 * I think that vandal should be banned permanently for being so horribly uncreative. ~ Infrangible 03:57, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: there were some posts here that look like they got chopped up, but I'd have to search through the whole page history back to 2009 to find the originals.  —  Soap  —  19:48, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

tglkhjidtjortjyhifyouhftihjyijhogtijhgyoi is not accurate SilverAce200 (talk) 10:24, 14 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Way back machine? 2607:FEA8:A4C3:9E00:B03B:E588:F30A:25B3 (talk) 12:30, 15 July 2024 (UTC)

Poo - use as actor's makeup
The Desolation of Smaug, video blog #11 has a section which uses the word "poo" in the sense of actor's makeup. That should be added here. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nmD5qwjeJws

Jerryfern (talk) 17:40, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

Wow... SilverAce200 (talk) 09:37, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

Clarification on first sentence
User:Bkonrad: just wondering why we cannot have more than one wikilink in the first sentence? I had suggested this: "Poo is a colloquialism (or child language) for feces. It is less offensive term than the other colloquial term: shit." - If we are not allowed to wikilink to colloquialism, can we please use a word that lay person would find easier to understand. EMsmile (talk) 15:39, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
 * I came to this page because there is a World Toilet Day coming up in November and it will have a topic on poo, so more people might look this one up around then.EMsmile (talk) 16:13, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Neither of the articles colloquialism or shit mention the term "poo". MOS:DABENTRY provides the guidance . older ≠ wiser 17:12, 18 July 2017 (