Talk:Pope John numbering

Requested move 1 March 2017

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: page moved. (non-admin closure) GeoffreyT2000  ( talk,  contribs ) 23:48, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

Pope John (numbering) → Pope John numbering – Improper use of disambiguating parenthesis since the numbering dispute would not itself be known simply as "Pope John." Unless anyone can think of a better title for this, removing the brackets is appropriate. Ribbet32 (talk) 20:17, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Support move. This one's as noncontroversial as any Pope-related move can be.  ONR  (talk) 20:54, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Support per WP:COMMONSENSE and WP:DAB; the nominator's analysis is correct.  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼  22:54, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Support per original proposal. I wonder if there's a title that would sound a little less stilted ("Numbering of Popes John?") but the proposed one is probably fine. --Jfruh (talk) 09:37, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Or Pope John numeration? One of my hopes in starting this RM was that we could come up with a less pedestrian title. Ribbet32 (talk) 19:18, 4 March 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.