Talk:Pope Paschal I

Unacceptable sources
this edit is unacceptable; the sources therein are forums and blogs. Please read WP:IRS and try to understand what sources are acceptable to Wikipedia as reliable. Elizium23 (talk) 00:17, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
 * I agree with Elizium23. cookiecrumbstoliveby.wordpress.com is no WP:RS, while heiligenlexikon.de seems reliable (they have an impressum listing the contributors, the coordinator is a theologian and a retired protestant pastor, so I personally would believe them at least if the facts given are not subject to modern-day disputes). --Rsk6400 (talk) 16:16, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
 * It's no good idea to revert after a discussion has been started. Please remember WP:3RR and remember that 3RR is only the last red line. You already started an edit war. I think Vollständiges Heiligenlexikon is not reliable, since it's too old. I don't see why you added the category "Early Church stub". The article is no stub. --Rsk6400 (talk) 16:56, 1 June 2021 (UTC)


 * The wordpress sourced is definitely not reliable and material sourced to it should not be restored. -- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 17:17, 1 June 2021 (UTC)