Talk:Popehat/Archive 1

Removal of "Multiple Issues"-template?
The article currently has a "multiple issues"-tag concerning multiple supposed problems with the article: I don't know much about the site other than seeing it pop up a few times on Twitter, in fact I only discovered this page because I looked it up for more info. Any thoughts on the points stated above? Best Regards, InsaneHacker (&#128490;) 20:51, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Notability - The article has been through an AfD where the result was "Keep", I'm not saying that definitively establishes anything, but combined with the fact that there are now multiple secondary sources about the article subject, surely this could be reexamined?
 * Too many primary sources - From a quick glance, it appears that only 11 out of 29 of the sources are from Popehat itself. That's barely a third of the sources in an article that only has one section, is this really a valid critique then?
 * Non-reliable sources - When this template was put on the article (2013), the sources were only a Reddit AMA and the employee page from a law firm. Since then a bunch of secondary sources have been added. Of course those could be considered unreliable as well, but some of them are respected news outlets.

Death of co-blogger
https://popehat.substack.com/p/a-farewell-to-a-friend https://twitter.com/pipandbaby/status/1572036591673131008 Author Patrick has passed away. Iamscottevil (talk) 16:41, 20 September 2022 (UTC)