Talk:Popular Resistance of the Eastern Region

anti-Kurdish sentiment
You seem to have started an edit war, and your last revert was done without explanation. If you believe Turkey support the attacks and FSA guerillas in SDF areas you need to present a source for it. Jim7049 (talk) 05:21, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

Wrong article Takinginterest01 (talk) 05:23, 22 February 2019 (UTC)


 * You seem to have started an edit war, and your last revert was done without explanation. If you believe the group has an anti-Kurdish sentiment, you need a source that claims it. I have read all the sources and none of it mention anti-Kurdish sentiment, ideals or behaviors by the group. Jim7049 (talk) 05:23, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
 * You are ignoring the fact the group has said that they do not want Kurds in Arab areas, hence the part "sentiment" Takinginterest01 (talk) 05:28, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Do you have a source that says that? Even if they did that does not count as anti-Kurdish sentiment. It is simply keeping Arabs where they are and keeping Kurds were they are. Although what you just said is not even in the sources as well. Jim7049 (talk) 05:31, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
 * In my opinion the articles indicate this but from your perspective they don't this is a matter of interpretation it seems. It should be taken into account that no other user since the publishing of this article has questioned it or denied it or felt the same way you have, and extensive research was done on my end in writing this article and this is the conclusion that was found from the sources, and to just come in here randomly, remove it and say continuously "it's not in the source" is a bit immature, and then atop of that to accuse me of starting an edit war just makes it worse.Takinginterest01 (talk) 05:40, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Ok let me teach you the rules of Wikipedia, if you wish to make an edit you need a source for it. And therefore what you just said is meaningless. Jim7049 (talk) 05:42, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
 * There is no need to have such a condescending tone, I have been on wikipedia longer than you have, written more articles than you have and made over a thousand more edits than you have and have far less rule violations than you, I am familiar wikipedia rules and policy, none of which have been breached here you have no basis to what you are saying. Takinginterest01 (talk) 05:48, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
 * I congratulate you, if you know the Wikipedia rules as you have said you'll realize that the change you are trying to make is against it and called original research. Having spend more time on Wikipedia than me does not allow you to breach it. Jim7049 (talk) 05:50, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
 * I never said it did allow me to break the rules that'd be absurd of me if I did, I said I have not violated any rules and I have pointed out no other user has disputed this aside from you, this is not original research, it'd be original research if I said "the group is composed of members who hate Kurds and wish to genocide them based on Baathist policy linked..." something like that, that would be an example of original research, but I didn't write something like that, every article has pointed to something saying that a sentiment against Kurdish dominance in SDF/YPG is a driving factor to A. the group's existence and B. the group's ideology, just because an article/source doesn't say the exact words "anti-Kurdish sentiment" doesn't mean it is not true. Takinginterest01 (talk) 05:56, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
 * That is exactly what OR is, let me copy paste this from the OR lede: "Original Research ...includes any analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to reach or imply a conclusion not stated by the sources." Jim7049 (talk) 06:01, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Yet again I did not do that, you can try to portray that image all you want but I did not do what you are accusing me of.Takinginterest01 (talk) 06:06, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
 * I wanna add this too, I did not look for the exact words of anti-Kurdish sentiment. There was absolutely nothing related to opposition towards Kurds in any of the sources in any form. Meanwhile on the other hand there was mention towards opposition to Arabs by the SDF in one of the sources, including "stemming discrimination against non-Kurdish civilians". So I don't know where you got this "anti-Kurdish sentiment" idea from but it definitely isn't mentioned in any of the sources in any way. And you have failed to present it as well. I suggest you admit that you have made a mistake. Jim7049 (talk) 06:09, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
 * What you just quoted is sentiment against Kurds, do you know what the word sentiment means?Takinginterest01 (talk) 06:14, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Perhaps you have read it incorrectly, i'll repeat it again: "stemming discrimination against non-Kurdish civilians". Not against the Kurds, stemming against non-Kurds meaning Arabs etc. Jim7049 (talk) 06:16, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
 * I understand perfectly well what it means, Arabs are not satisfied with KURDISH dominance and discrimination by Kurds against Arabs thus meaning there is a sentiment against Kurds present.Takinginterest01 (talk) 06:21, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Ok first of all it wasn't the group which have accused the Kurds of discrimination against Arabs, it was the source mintpressnews, so I don't get your thinking process of trying to portray the group Popular Resistance of the Eastern Region of having anti-Kurdish sentiments. Jim7049 (talk) 06:24, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
 * And on the same note I do not understand how you fail to comprehend the situation.Takinginterest01 (talk) 06:30, 22 February 2019 (UTC)