Talk:Porpita prunella

Good effort!
Without any expertise in biology, my opinion is that your additions have improved the article. I have only done a minimal check on the sources you cite, so it would be good to have a more thorough review to verify the sources support the claims made in the article. If you are ready for more in-depth review of the scientific content, then please do follow the advice of to place  at the top of the article.

Another pointer: the lead paragraph should summarize content in the rest of the article, like an executive summary. In my opinion, the info about whether it exists should probably be in the body of the content rather than the lead. Whatever is written in the lead takes on additional importance, which may be misplaced in this case.

You can also participate in Biology-related discussions and ask for editing help or an assessment of article quality at the Biology Project's talk page.

Cheers! — Grand&#39;mere Eugene (talk) 22:33, 15 January 2015 (UTC)