Talk:Port of Albany–Rensselaer/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

I don't think this article is close to passing. There is much useful information here, but it is too disorganized, the writing is too sloppy in places, and there are insufficient citations. I'll try later to provide some useful advice for improvements, but I don't anticipate passing this article in the near term. If you would like, do seek a second opinion who may be more familiar with the subject matter. Crystal whacker (talk) 05:23, 2 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Have begun to find citations for every possible fact in article. It would be useful if Crystal or anyone else could let us know which sentences need citations more than others so priorities can be set instead of just finding citations for things that might not be all that urgent at this point. Same with the sloppy writing and disorganization, just need to know where to begin. Thank you.Camelbinky (talk) 01:31, 4 January 2009 (UTC)


 * I have taken a second look and now have a more favorable impression. Sorry I can't be more specific at this moment; I'll try to return later this week.  I added some images from Wikimedia commons. Crystal whacker (talk) 16:09, 4 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Camelbinky already knows this, but other readers should see User talk:Crystal whacker. Crystal whacker (talk) 16:10, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

Albany Basin
I added a link to Albany Basin, but it redirects back to this article. Nowhere does this article explain what the Albany Basin is. Camelbinky, could you add this info, either in this article or in a separate article? Crystal whacker (talk) 18:18, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I found a mention of Albany Basin later in the article, and I bolded it. That might help readers. Crystal whacker (talk)

Missing references
I won't retract the "sloppy" writing statement I made above, but I fixed all instances of it that I could find. If you're not done with your general education, see misplaced modifier or dangling modifier (I forget which) for one of the types of errors I found in your writing. It's always important to make clear what you are saying: the Erie Canal does not go to Montreal; rather the Erie Canal goes to Lake Erie, and another separate canal goes to Montreal.

I noticed several sentences that had missing references. It may be that the fact was stated in a reference cited elsewhere; if so, use to use the same reference for two separate statements. If this confuses you, I can help you with the technical aspects of implementation. Find the statements needing sources by searching for "citation needed", like this. This is a "deal breaker" for Good Article status: if you can't find references, or explain why references are not needed, I will not pass the article.

The references that do exist are apparently from reliable sources. Where possible you should add the author, date of publication, and any other available information in case someone wants to look up the source. Crystal whacker (talk) 23:08, 8 January 2009 (UTC)


 * I wish not to keep this on hold indefinitely, so for now I am failing this article. If you add references where they are marked as being needed, you may resubmit the article either to me or to a new reviewer. Crystal whacker (talk) 23:39, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

Review reopened
Camelbinky made substantial improvements to the article and asked me to review it again. I checked the difference between what I reviewed and the current version, and I am satisfied that he has answered all my concerns, especially by citing the previously unattributed statements. After a quick check to make sure everything is in order, I anticipate that I will pass this article. Crystal whacker (talk) 00:47, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

Reference checking
I am converting references to Google Books to "cite book" format. It is an inconsequential change, but it allows me to add ISBN and other relevant information as I would for a printed book used as a source. Crystal whacker (talk) 01:00, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

On reference number 5, you state "John Rives" as the author. I can't find his name in the link. Are you sure that he is the author? Is it stated somewhere in the source that I just didn't see?

I added Jeffrey S. Levinton as the author of reference number 9 regarding the Hudson River estuary. The course homepage, of which the linked page is a subpage, lists as the contact info of the professor an email address which checks out with Dr. Levinton's email address at SUNY Stony Brook. It appears that Dr. Levinton is a professor at Stony Brook and gave a visiting lecture or course at SUNY Albany; therefore I list the publisher as SUNY Stony Brook. (Full disclosure: I am a student at SUNY Stony Brook, and Camelbinky studied at SUNY Albany, so there may be a little "turf war" happening here.) Crystal whacker (talk) 01:12, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

The reference titled "Energy fuels ..." links to a page that "does not exist." Is it possible to update the link or to obtain the author, date and other information if the link cannot be recovered? Crystal whacker (talk) 01:21, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I am replacing that link with this one. Crystal whacker (talk) 01:23, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

I changed the NYSAA newsletter to "cite journal". Crystal whacker (talk) 01:34, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

Of no relevance to this article, but worth a passing note nonetheless: Alan G. Hevesi, Comptroller appears at the top left of the 2006 audit. Alas, how the mighty have fallen! Crystal whacker (talk) 01:52, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

"Claims settled in deadly Stellamare capsizing" is a dead link. I was not able to find a replacement link. Again, please try to find the author and date if a replacement link is unavailable. (By the way, I am diligent to add such information to all references precisely because I am worried about linkrot.) Crystal whacker (talk) 02:09, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
 * It's possible that the articles are available in online archives by subscription only. Crystal whacker (talk) 02:11, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

"Albany man charged in copper theft" - for some reason you put in a link to "edit this page" on Wikipedia. OOPS!! :) Anyway, the Times Union site is again a 404 error, so I put in a different link and added the author and date. Crystal whacker (talk) 02:18, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

Okay, I'm getting tired of this, and it's not essential to cross all the I's and dot all the T's, much as I want to do it. I've spent about an hour on this, or at least a half hour, and that will be enough. If I can manage to finish fixing up the references, that would be nice, but I won't make it a high priority. Crystal whacker (talk) 02:26, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

Passed
I am passing the article now as a Good Article. Crystal whacker (talk) 02:26, 16 January 2009 (UTC)