Talk:Porta Esquilina

[Untitled]
Hey, I really thought that this article was awesome. The formatting was great and I love the depth of the information presented. The only thing that I was left wondering about was why it was converted to the three arch system later. I don't know if its possible to find this information, but I wanted to know more about why this happened.

-Amanda Zusman

helpme

I would really like to know how to make all of my updates to this article show. It all gets cut-off on the article page. Kfd182 07:04, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
 * If you look here, you can see all of your updates. John Reaves (talk) 07:18, 11 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Some of the ref tags were instead of, I have fixed them and more of the article is showing up now. Footnotes explains how to use the ref system (I know it is tricky)--Commander Keane 07:21, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

Thank you sooooo much. I was updating this for a class project that is due tomorrow. Thanks again

Kfd182 07:23, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

Hey Ken! Your article is really good. I liked the way you decided to split up the sections and it works really well with your topic. The only suggestion I would offer you (your article looks very complete seeing as you looked in 14 sources!) would be maybe to include more information on the physical description of the arch. You could possible talk about the architectural style of it. Looks good! Susan

Ken, your article is extremely thorough and well researched. One thing that you could possibly add might be about the particular style of the arch, what if anything makes it unique in architecture or in history, additionally where did it fit in with the overall planning of Rome as the city grew? Theses are very specific and there might not be information out there on the topic, but if there is that would be very useful/interesting. -Jeremy Kross