Talk:Portland Center Stage/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Thanks very much for the above review, will try to address the above points and get back to you in the time allotted. Cirt (talk) 00:55, 4 October 2008 (UTC) What do you want to do? - Peregrine Fisher (talk) (contribs) 17:11, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * - Peregrine Fisher (talk) (contribs) 00:51, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Response
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * - Peregrine Fisher (talk) (contribs) 00:51, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Response
 * Pass or Fail:
 * - Peregrine Fisher (talk) (contribs) 00:51, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Response
 * Addressing points from above
 * 1) I broke up the 2000 - present section's two paragraphs into four paragraphs. Cirt (talk) 04:22, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) I removed a few places where there were duplicate cites at the end of a sentence that weren't really necessary. Cirt (talk) 04:22, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
 * 3) I looked through many more sources than those that are actually used, but was not able to find much more noteworthy detail/discussion about individual plays, but on the other hand I was more looking to find stuff about the history of the organization itself. I take another look to see if I can do some more research on this, but not sure I will come up with much more. Cirt (talk) 04:22, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
 * 4) Thanks, I noticed there was some interesting history and changing of leadership with this organization, glad it is represented with appropriate wording. Cirt (talk) 04:22, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
 * 5) Nope, new article and all collaborate has been quite positive and constructive. Cirt (talk) 04:22, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
 * 6) I left a note with WP:OREGON, so we shall see if someone gets some free-use interior shots to upload to Wikimedia Commons for use in the article, not sure on a timetable for that though. Cirt (talk) 04:22, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
 * 7) Thanks for doing the review - like I said I am don't think much else exists out there as far as significant discussion historically of past plays, but I will try to do some more digging on that. Cirt (talk) 04:22, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I did a google news all dates no price search and there appears to be a lot of info out there.
 * Google search for "Portland Center Stage"
 * Google search for "Portland Center Stage"
 * Google search for "Portland Center Stage"
 * Google search for "Portland Center Stage"
 * Google search for "Portland Center Stage"
 * Ah good sources, seems like more recent stuff primarily as well, I was looking in older archival databases. I will incorporate these sources into the article and add info, perhaps a new subsection just on the plays, in the next few days, and then get back to you. Thanks, Cirt (talk) 17:18, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Sounds good. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) (contribs) 17:33, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm ready to pass this as a GA if you're done working on it. If you're going to keep working, I can wait. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) (contribs) 17:53, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Actually I was pretty much done, so if you think it is ready for GA then great. Of course the article will be improved further and probably expanded more on the road to further quality improvement and peer review. Cirt (talk) 02:48, 13 October 2008 (UTC)