Talk:Portland Institute for Contemporary Art

Merge proposal

 * Support merge as nom. Both articles are very short and the festival would probably not pass WP:NOTE on its own. Katr67 (talk) 01:52, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Oppose
 * 1) I oppose the merge as nominated. I split off and created the article on the Time-Based Art Festival because it is notable enough on its own to have such an article in Wikipedia (contrary to claim above).  It is a stub and needs other editors to develop it.  I don't have time to do so.  For comment, please see also: Talk:Time-Based Art Festival. --NYScholar (talk) 22:13, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

Discussion
Comment I am using nom here as shorthand for "nominator". I'm supporting the merge as the nominator. Please don't change people's posts on talk pages. See WP:TALK. And these don't usually get long enough to require separate sections. Katr67 (talk) 01:35, 13 January 2008 (UTC)