Talk:Portrait of Baldassare Castiglione

Copyright problem removed
One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. — Cactus Writer |   needles  04:29, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

Spelling of the subject's name
Is there a reason why the name of the sitter is spelled "Balthasar" when the title of the image is "Baldassare"? The link to the Louvre gives the spelling "Baldassare" and this is also the way it is spelled in John Pope-Hennessy's The Portrait in the Renaissance (Phaidon, 1966 p.116). Is it perhaps an effort to Anglicise the name? If so, I don't think it is necessary and it would be better for the article heading to use the same spelling as in the image and the texts. Whiteghost.ink 01:09, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
 * I wondered the same, especially given the Wikipedia article on Baldassare Castiglione, and that all the art books I find spell it 'Baldassare'. Is there any reason not to move this to a consistent spelling? JNW (talk) 21:17, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
 * It's been about a week without response so I'm assuming silent consent - so I've taken the liberty of moving the page - being BOLD :-) Feel free to revert me if this is controversial. Wittylama 09:46, 20 December 2011 (UTC)