Talk:Portraiture in ancient Egypt

This article needs some serious revisions
I absolutely was expecting to click "View history" and see only this version listed, as this article reads like it was written in one pass, without the author ever even reading it again before and after publishing it.

But i was surprised to see that i was wrong, and there are in fact many revisions. Why ? There are so many syntactic errors that i could easily see it being dictated out loud to a speech-to-text and pasted here.

And there's stuff like :

"Religious and funerary influence on ancient Egyptian art is great  as is made it utilitarian rather than aesthetic "

Oh boy, ancient Egyptian art sure seems cool to me too, thanks wikipedia.

The first version of the article includes this from the start, and it remained untouched trough multiple significant edits to its containing section, of which it is the very first sentence of. Meaning that everyone reads it. Why is no one changing it??

Well, ive read it and i too didnt change it, i simply cant find a way to rephrase it properly with my limited knowledge on the subject. Id need to explain why this is such a great thing in order to do that; And there it is, thats probably why it resists change.

So please, knowledgeable person reading this, rescue this article !!

Nilanz (talk) 20:22, 14 March 2023 (UTC)