Talk:Porzhensky Pogost

Third opinion on the photos
Saw this via WP:ANI. Edit warring and talking of being "punished" aside (which can be discussed at ANI), I thought I'd offer a third opinion on the photos. Ideally, the article would have all three: interior, exterior at ground level, and aerial. If choosing two, I think I'd go with the aerial and the ceiling. There are technical issues with the photo, yes, but it gives a better overall impression of the site. It also looks like it was improved in the time between the photos (or at least painted?), and so having a more recent one is a benefit there, too. But my main reason is the perspective it gives. For what it's worth. &mdash; Rhododendrites  talk \\ 13:45, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks, appreciated.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:07, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
 * FWIW I agree with Rhododendrites: the newer photo is more useful even though the older photo looks better. Jonathan A Jones (talk) 16:58, 17 October 2021 (UTC)