Talk:Post-Britpop/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: –– Jezhotwells (talk) 22:49, 3 April 2010 (UTC) I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Checking against GA criteria

 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * Reasonably well written and complies sufficiently with the MoS
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * All online sources are live links
 * The article is adequately referenced.
 * Sources all appear to be reliable
 * All sources support the cited statements
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * As broad as is possible for such a young genre.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * It appears fair and un-biassed
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * Stable, no edit warring
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * One image used, with correct licensing and a caption. Might be nice to see more pictures, but not a GA requirement
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * A good short article, and it meets all the GA criteria, so I am happy to list this. When we move onto the next genre, it may be possible to add a more retrospective look at the subject but for the moment it is fine. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 23:19, 3 April 2010 (UTC)