Talk:Postage stamp demonetization

Merger Needed
The great bulk of both articles comprises the same text. NoelWalley 23:39, 10 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Freaky - history makes it seems as though I created both independently about six months apart, somehow using nearly the exact same words each time. Anyway, it's cleaned up now, I hope. Stan 07:45, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

slight inaccuracy
"any unused stamp is effectively equivalent to its face value" Afaict at least in the UK this is not strictly true, some stamps do have a monetary face value but others are labeled with a class of service (e.g. 1st, 2nd, 1st large etc). Afaict one can gain a (small) financial advantage by buying such stamps just before a postage price increase. 20:21, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Postage stamp demonetization. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://archive.is/20130809232454/http://www.postnl.com/press/664420/Gulden_postzegel_nog_tot_1_november_2013_geldig.aspx to http://www.postnl.com/press/664420/Gulden_postzegel_nog_tot_1_november_2013_geldig.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 20:36, 21 January 2018 (UTC)