Talk:Postage stamps and postal history of Jamaica

Recommended rename
Recommend renaming (moving) simply to Postal history of Jamaica. That title would include stamps. Having that seperately seems a bit redundant. Great start to the article by the way.-- Oni Ookami Alfador Talk 03:59, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Most of the articles get both terms into the name, as one can see in Category:Postal history by country etc, since they are combined accounts and it helps garner Google hits. I would consider a postal-history-alone article to concentrate on rates and routes, mentioning stamps only incidentally. Stan (talk) 04:19, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh wow, I guess I can see how that makes sense now. While I still think it doesn't sound very good, I can certainly agree with it given the overwhelming standard that is set and the whole search engine precedent I didn't even think of.--  Oni Ookami Alfador Talk 04:43, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
 * I agree, I've never cared for the wordiness, but the alternatives have their own downsides. I was influenced by noticing many of the standard references (such as Boggs for Canada) are titled in much the same way (perhaps for the benefit of librarians doing searches, heh). Stan (talk) 04:47, 29 December 2007 (UTC)